Section 4: Refusal to release on bail
consolidated text (as at 2011, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
4. Refusal to release on bail
(1) A Court may refuse to release a defendant or a detainee on bail
where—
(a) it is satisfied that there is reasonable ground for believing that
the defendant or detainee if released is likely to—
(i) fail to surrender to custody or to appear before a Court as
and when required;
(ii) commit an offence, other than an offence punishable only
by a fine;
[Issue 4] B1 – 2
Revised Laws of Mauritius
(iii) interfere with witnesses, tamper with evidence or otherwise obstruct the course of justice, in relation to him or to
any other person;
(b) it is satisfied that the defendant or detainee should be kept in
custody—
(i) for his own protection;
(ii) in the case of a minor, for his own welfare; or
(iii) for the preservation of public order;
(c) the defendant or detainee, having been released on bail, has—
(i) committed an act referred to in paragraph (a); or
(ii) breached any other condition imposed on him for his release;
(d) the defendant or detainee is charged or is likely to be charged
with a serious offence;
(e) there is reasonable ground for believing that the defendant or
detainee has—
(i) given false or misleading information regarding his names
or address; or
(ii) no fixed place of abode;
(f) a detainee has failed to comply with section 12 (2).
(2) In considering whether or not to refuse bail on any ground mentioned in
subsection (1), the Court shall decide the matter by weighing the interests of
society against the right of the defendant or detainee to his liberty and the
prejudice he is likely to suffer if he is detained in custody, taking into account
every consideration which, in its opinion, is relevant, including—
(a) the period for which the defendant or detainee has already been
in custody since his arrest;
(b) the nature and gravity of the offence with which the defendant
or detainee is or is likely to be charged and the nature and gravity of the penalty which may be imposed on him;
(c) the character, association, means, community ties and antecedents of the defendant or detainee, including any non-compliance
with any condition imposed for his release on bail with respect to
any other offence; and
(d) the nature of the evidence available with regard to the offence
with which the defendant is charged.
(3) Where a request for the release on bail of a defendant or detainee is
objected to, the Court shall place on record the written reasons for his
determination thereon.
(4) (a) Where a Magistrate has ordered the release on bail of a defendant
or a detainee notwithstanding an objection by the Commissioner of Police or
the Director of Public Prosecutions on any of the grounds set out in this section, the Commissioner of Police or the Director of Public Prosecutions, as the
B1 – 3 [Issue 4]
Bail Act
case may be, may, within 7 days of the determination of the Magistrate, apply
to the Supreme Court for an order setting aside the decision of the Magistrate
to release the defendant or detainee.
(b) Where, immediately after ordering the release of the defendant or
detainee, the Magistrate is notified by the Director of Public Prosecutions that
an application under paragraph (a) is being made and that a stay of execution
is required, the Magistrate shall stay execution of the order and remand the
defendant or detainee until the Supreme Court determines the application.
(5) Pending the determination of an application made under subsection (4) (a), the Supreme Court may, where the defendant or detainee has
been r
fter ordering the release of the defendant or
detainee, the Magistrate is notified by the Director of Public Prosecutions that
an application under paragraph (a) is being made and that a stay of execution
is required, the Magistrate shall stay execution of the order and remand the
defendant or detainee until the Supreme Court determines the application.
(5) Pending the determination of an application made under subsection (4) (a), the Supreme Court may, where the defendant or detainee has
been released on bail and no stay of execution has been sought under subsection (4) (b), on motion made by the Director of Public Prosecutions, order
that the decision of the Magistrate be stayed and that the defendant be
apprehended and remanded in custody.
(6) A defendant or a detainee whose release on bail is refused under subsection (1) shall be remanded in custody for a period not exceeding 21 days,
after which the defendant or detainee shall be brought again before the
Court.
(7) Where a defendant or detainee has been remanded by the Magistrate
under subsection (4) (b) and the Commissioner of Police or the Director of
Public Prosecutions fails to apply to the Supreme Court within 7 days as
provided in subsection (4) (a), the defendant shall forthwith be brought
before the Magistrate who shall thereupon release him on bail as originally
ordered by the Magistrate.
[S. 4 amended by ss. 6 and 12 of Act 34 of 2011 w.e.f. 1 January 2012.]
PART III – CONDITIONS FOR RELEASE ON BAIL
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- On what grounds can a court refuse to release me on bail?
- If bail is refused, how long can I be remanded in custody before I must be brought before the Court again?
- If a Magistrate grants me bail but the police object, can the police apply to the Supreme Court to have that decision set aside, and by when?
- If the police fail to apply to the Supreme Court in time after objecting to my bail, must I be released on bail as originally ordered?