Section 111:
consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
111. New trial – Counsel to depone as witness – Withdrawal as Counsel—
Appellant’s Counsel was allowed to withdraw on the day fixed for the hearing of the appellant’s prayer for a new trial of proceedings, so that he could
depone as a witness. Appellant’s motion for a postponement to be able to
retrain another Counsel was refused and his prayer for a new trial was
rejected.
HELD The appellant was not himself guilty of laches. The professional
fault of the appellant’s Counsel when he chose to wait until the day of the
hearing to withdraw for the reasons given may have been reflected unfairly
on the appellant and, consequent to Counsel’s motion being acceded to, the
appellant should have been given an opportunity to retain another Counsel in
the very particular circumstances of this present case. Ramen v Ghoorun
(2000).
[Issue 1] CON – 196
Revised Laws of Mauritius
B. Adjournment