Section 149: Evidence heard by only one of two Magistrates—At a trial before the
consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
149. Evidence heard by only one of two Magistrates—At a trial before the
Intermediate Court, 2 Magistrates heard the case and judgment was finally
delivered by the Court composed of 2 Magistrates one of whom had not
heard the evidence or submission of Counsel.
On appeal it was contended that the appellant had not been granted a
“fair hearing” within the meaning of section 10 (8) of the Constitution.
HELD in the context “fair hearing” means a fair trial according to the provisions of the law which empowered a Magistrate to be replaced by another.
Audibert v Raghoonundun (1980).
[EDITORIAL NOTE: Reversed in Sip Heng Wong Ng v R (1985).]
CON – 205 [Issue 1]
The Constitution