juris

Section 195: Use of private car as taxi – Presumption—The appellant, owner of a

Constitution · PART V: HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.

195. Use of private car as taxi – Presumption—The appellant, owner of a car licensed as a private car, took passengers in his car at a hotel and drove away. The Magistrate relying on the presumption created by section 188 (1) (a) of the Road Traffic Ordinance (now Act), found him guilty of [Issue 1] CON – 218 Revised Laws of Mauritius having used his private car as a taxi. It was contended, on appeal, that the presumption relied upon by the Magistrate offended against section 10 (2) (a) of the Constitution of Mauritius, which provides that every person charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed to be innocent until he is proved or has pleaded guilty. HELD section 188 (1) of the Road Traffic Ordinance (now Act) does not contravene section 10 (2) (a) of the Constitution. Parmessur v R (1979).

Ask juris about this section Official source