Section 209: Protection of the law – Minimum penalty—The appellant appealed
consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
209. Protection of the law – Minimum penalty—The appellant appealed
against a sentence of 12 months’ imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10,000
which was the minimum that could be imposed by the trial court under section 24 (1) (a) of the Firearms Act. One of his grounds of appeal was that
section 24 (1) (a) of the Act is repugnant to section 3 of the Constitution.
HELD Parliament was empowered to impose a fixed minimum penalty for
an offence as opposed to selecting a penalty for a particular case. Section 24 (1) (a) of the Firearms Act is not compatible with section 3 of the
Constitution, given that the National Assembly was free to impose a minimum sentence in respect of the offences with which the appellant was
charged, having regard to the public interest involved in the control of firearms and ammunition. Labonne v State (2000).