Section 219: Validity – In general – Uncertain or irregular markings by voter—The
consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
219. Validity – In general – Uncertain or irregular markings by voter—The
provisions of the Legislative Council Ordinance, 1948 (now the Representation of the People Act), which relate to the marking of ballot papers by electors should be interpreted liberally and effect should be given to an elector’s
vote whenever he has indicated sufficiently clearly his intention to vote and
the particular candidate for whom he had intended to vote. The relevant provision of the law, in this regard, is directory and not mandatory. At an election a number of electors had indicated their votes by figures, or figures and
crosses, (such figures being those allotted to the candidates on the ballot
papers).
HELD in the absence of any evidence to show that the electors concerned had used figures in pursuance of some preconcerted arrangement, the
figures could not lead to identification and the ballot papers should therefore
be allowed as valid. The Court rejected a number of ballot papers by reason
of the presence thereon of writings, marks, and other irregularities which
either caused uncertainty or could lead to the identification of the voters.
Rivalland v Chaperon (1953).