Section 297: Reprint of laws of Mauritius – Discrepancy from original—Rouillard’s
consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
297. Reprint of laws of Mauritius – Discrepancy from original—Rouillard’s
collection of the laws of Mauritius is not authoritative as a proclamation of
laws, but only a reprint, under the authority of Government, of laws already
proclaimed. Such collection is no evidence of the Statute law of the land.
Where there was a discrepancy between the text, one text of a section as
published in this collection and the text of the same section, as it appeared
in a certified copy of the original section,
HELD the judgment ought to have been delivered on the latter text. R v
Baudon (1870).