Section 309: National Assembly – Suspension of a member—The Supreme Court
consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
309. National Assembly – Suspension of a member—The Supreme Court
has no jurisdiction, except where an infringement of a constitutional principle
is involved, to intervene in the affairs of the Assembly, including a decision
to suspend a member. Bérenger v Jeewoolall (1999).
G. Speaker
310 Powers of Speaker of Legislative Assembly—The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly, the respondent, had ruled on 20 November 1990 that a motion proposing his revocation as Speaker was not debatable on the basis that
the matter was sub judice. The applicant, the Prime Minister of Mauritius,
sought a declaration that the ruling of 20 November 1990 was improper and
that an apprehended ruling of the Speaker on 27 November 1990 in relation
to the presentation of the Constitution of Mauritius (Amendment No. 3) Bill
was contrary to law.
No Speaker should preside over, still less rule on, a debate or motion in
which the Speaker’s personal and private interests are at stake. Jugnauth v
Daby (1990).
CON – 245 [Issue 1]
The Constitution