Section 173: Statements of witnesses
consolidated text (as at 2011, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
173. Statements of witnesses
(1) (a) Any witness may be cross-examined at any trial as to previous
statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing relative to the
subject matter of the trial, without the writing being shown to him, or read,
but if it is intended to contradict the witness by the writing, his attention
must, before such contradictory proof can be given, be called to those parts
of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of so contradicting him.
[Issue 1] C54 – 40
Revised Laws of Mauritius
(b) The Court may at any time during the trial require the production
of the writing to be used for the purposes of the trial in any way that to the
Court seems proper.
(2) (a) It shall be competent to examine any witness who may be called
in any judicial proceeding as to whether he has on any specified occasion
made a statement on any matter pertaining to the issue which is different
from the evidence given by him in that proceeding, and it shall be competent
in the course of such proceeding to adduce evidence to prove that the witness, whether he has shown himself hostile or not, has made a different
statement on the occasion specified.
(b) Nothing in paragraph (a) shall make any such statement of itself
evidence of the proof of any fact or facts embodied in it.
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Can a witness be cross-examined on a previous written statement they made?
- Can the court require me to produce a witness's earlier written statement during the trial?