Section 12: Attribution of electronic record and signature
consolidated text (as at 2012, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
12. Attribution of electronic record and signature
(1) An electronic record or electronic signature shall be attributable to a
person where it was the act of that person.
(2) The act of a person referred to in subsection (1) may be shown in the
manner set out in this section which includes the proper application of any
security procedure to determine the person to whom the electronic record or
electronic signature is attributable.
(3) An electronic record shall be deemed to be that of the originator
where it was sent—
(a) by a person who had the authority to act on behalf of the originator in respect of that electronic record; or
(b) by an information processing system programmed by or on behalf of the originator to operate automatically.
E5 – 7 [Issue 1]
Electronic Transactions Act
(4) Subject to subsection (5), an addressee is entitled to regard an electronic record as being that of the originator and to act on that assumption
where—
(a) in order to ascertain whether the electronic record was that of
the originator, the addressee properly applied a procedure previously agreed to by the originator for that purpose; or
(b) the data message as received by the addressee resulted from the
actions of a person whose relationship with the originator or
with any agent of the originator enabled that person to gain access to a method used by the originator to identify an electronic
record as its own.
(5) Subsection (4) shall not apply—
(a) from the time when the addressee has both received notice from
the originator that the electronic record is not that of the originator, and had reasonable time to act accordingly;
(b) in a case referred to in subsection (4) (b), at any time when the
addressee knew or ought to have known, had it exercised reasonable care or used any agreed procedure, that the electronic
record was not that of the originator; or
(c) where, in all the circumstances of the case, there are reasonable
grounds for the addressee to regard the electronic record as that
of the originator or to act on that assumption.
(6) Subject to subsection (7), where an electronic record is that of the
originator or is deemed to be that of the originator, or where the addressee is
entitled to act on that assumption, the addressee shall be entitled to regard
the electronic record received as being what the originator intended to send,
and to act on that assumption.
(7) The addressee shall not be entitled to regard the electronic record received as being what the originator intended to send where the addressee
knew or ought to have known, had the addressee exercised reasonable care
or used any agreed procedure, that the transmission resulted in any error in
the electronic record as received.
(8) The addressee shall be entitled to regard each electronic record received as a separate electronic record and to act on that assumption, except
to the extent that the addressee duplicates another electronic record and the
addressee knew or ought to have known, had the addressee exercised reasonable care or used any agreed procedure, that the electronic record was a
duplicate.
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- When is an electronic record treated as having come from the person it names as sender?
- Can I rely on an electronic record as coming from someone if I followed an agreed verification procedure?