Section 10A: Temporary suspension of suspicious transaction
This section is inserted by The Anti-money Laundering, Combatting the Financing of Terrorism and Countering Proliferation Financing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, section 10.
consolidated text (as at 2016, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
10A. Temporary suspension of suspicious transaction
(1) The FIU may, in writing, order a reporting person to temporarily
suspend the performance of a suspicious transaction where –
(a) the FIU has to urgently verify the data on the suspicious
transaction, any person or funds or collection of
additional data, information or documentation in
Mauritius or abroad; or
(b) the FIU has reasonable grounds to believe that the
transaction, person or funds are related to money
laundering, terrorist financing or proliferation financing,
or any related predicate offence.
(2) Subject to subsection (3), a temporary suspension under
subsection (1) shall be for a period not exceeding 72 hours from the time of the
issuance of the order to the reporting person.
(3) Where the deadline referred to in subsection (2) falls on a
Sunday, public holiday or non-working day of the FIU, the temporary
suspension shall be for a period not exceeding 120 hours from the time of the
issuance of the order to the reporting person.
(4) The FIU may, on good cause shown, apply to a Judge to extend
the duration of the temporary suspension of the performance of the suspicious
transaction under subsection (1) for an additional period of 72 hours or such
other period as the Judge thinks fit in the interests of justice.
(5) The FIU may request a reporting person to furnish additional
information on a temporarily suspended transaction, and the reporting person
shall furnish that information within 24 hours from the time of the request.
(6) The FIU shall, without delay, inform the Financial Crimes
Commission of the issue of an order under this section for the exercise of any
function, duty or power it may deem appropriate under the Financial Crimes
Commission Act 2023.
(7) The FIU may, at any time prior to the expiry of an order issued
under this section, terminate the order where it considers that there are no
reasons for maintaining the temporary suspension of the performance of the
suspicious transaction and shall, without delay, inform the reporting person and
the Financial Crimes Commission of the termination of the order.
(8) Any reporting person, its officers or its agents shall not disclose
to any person that the FIU has issued an order, including the termination of an
order, under this section.
(e) in section 13 –
(i) in subsection (1), by deleting the words “or terrorism financing” and
replacing them by the words ", terrorism financing or proliferation
financing”;
(ii) in subsection (3)(a), by deleting the words “or a terrorism financing
offence” and replacing them by the words ", terrorism financing offence
or proliferation financing offence”;
(f) in Part IV –
(i) in the heading, by deleting the words “OF TERRORISM” and replacing
them by the words “OF TERRORISM AND PROLIFERATION”;
(ii) in section 17 –
(A) in subsection (1)(a), by deleting the words “and terrorism
financing” and replacing them by the words ", terrorism financing
and proliferation financing”;
(B) in subsection (2), by deleting the words “and terrorism financing”
and replacing them by the words ", terrorism financing and
proliferation financing”;
(C) by inserting, after subsection (2), the following new subsection
–
(2A) The process of reporting persons to identify,
assess, monitor, manage and mitigate proliferation financingrisks may be done within the framework of their existing targeted
financial sanctions or compliance programmes, or both.
(D) in subsection (3), by deleting the words “or terrorism financ
y deleting the words “and terrorism financing”
and replacing them by the words ", terrorism financing and
proliferation financing”;
(C) by inserting, after subsection (2), the following new subsection
–
(2A) The process of reporting persons to identify,
assess, monitor, manage and mitigate proliferation financingrisks may be done within the framework of their existing targeted
financial sanctions or compliance programmes, or both.
(D) in subsection (3), by deleting the words “or terrorism financing”
and replacing them by the words ", terrorism financing or
proliferation financing”;
(E) by adding the following new subsection –
(5) A supervisory authority may determine that risk
assessments are not required to be documented by its
respective reporting persons, provided that the specific risks
inherent to the sector are clearly identified and understood and
that each reporting person understands its money laundering,
terrorism financing or proliferation financing risks.
(iii) in section 17A, in subsection (1), by repealing paragraph (a) and
replacing it by the following paragraph –
(a) establish policies, controls and procedures,
consistent with this Act and any guidance from
competent authorities, to mitigate and manage
effectively the risks of money laundering,
terrorism financing or proliferation financing
identified in any risk assessment undertaken by
the reporting person under section 17 or in the
national risk assessment conducted under
section 19D;
(iv) in section 17E –
(A) in subsection (1), by deleting the words “had a business
relationship on 9 August 2018” and replacing them by the words
“has a business relationship”;
(B) by repealing subsection (3) and replacing it by the following
subsection –
(3) For the purpose of conducting CDD under
subsection (1) –
“beneficial owner” –
(a) in the context of a legal person –
(i) refers to the natural person –
(A) who ultimately owns or
controls a customer;
(B) on whose behalf a
transaction is being
conducted;
(ii) includes a natural person who
exercises ultimate effective
control over the legal person;
(b) in the context of a legal arrangement
includes –
(i) the settlor;
(ii) the trustee;
(iii) the protector, if any;
(iv) each beneficiary, or where
applicable, the class of
beneficiaries and objects of a
power; and
(v) any other natural person
exercising ultimate effective
control, including where
ownership or control is exercised
through a chain of ownership or
control, over the legal
arrangement;
(c) in the case of a legal arrangement similar
to an express trust, refers to the natural
person holding an equivalent position to
those referred to in paragraph (b).
(d) where the trustee and any other party to
the legal arrangement is a legal person,
refers to the beneficial owner of that legal
person;
(e) in the context of a beneficiary under a life
or other investment linked insurance
policy, refers to the natural person who
ultimately owns or controls the
beneficiary; or
(f) where there is doubt as to whether the
natural person identified under paragraph
(a) or where no natural person is
identified as the beneficial owner of a
legal person, reporting persons shall
identify and take reasonable measures to
verify the identity of the relevant natural
person who holds the position of senior
managing official.
(iv) in section 18 –
(A) in subsection (1)(a), by deleting the words “activities and
terrorism financing” and replacing them by the words “, terrorism
financing and proliferation financing
o whether the
natural person identified under paragraph
(a) or where no natural person is
identified as the beneficial owner of a
legal person, reporting persons shall
identify and take reasonable measures to
verify the identity of the relevant natural
person who holds the position of senior
managing official.
(iv) in section 18 –
(A) in subsection (1)(a), by deleting the words “activities and
terrorism financing” and replacing them by the words “, terrorism
financing and proliferation financing”;
(B) in subsection (2), by adding the following new paragraphs –
(d) Where the Bank of Mauritius intends to
impose an administrative penalty under paragraph (b), it shall
notify the bank or cash dealer, in writing, of –
(i) its intention to impose the
administrative penalty, and the
grounds for imposing such
penalty;
(ii) the type and terms of the
administrative penalty; and
(iii) the right of the bank or cash
dealer to make written
representations to the Bank of
Mauritius within 21 days of the
notice.
(e) Where, after considering the written
representations under paragraph (d)(iii), the Bank of Mauritius
is satisfied that the bank or cash dealer has contravened
paragraph (a), or where no written representations are received,
it shall impose the administrative penalty on the bank or cash
dealer, as the case may be.
(f) Any bank or cash dealer that is
dissatisfied with a decision of the Bank of Mauritius relating to
the imposition of an administrative penalty under paragraph (e)
may apply for a judicial review of the decision in accordance with
Sub-part VIA of Part II of the Courts Act.
(v) in section 19, in subsection (2)(b), by deleting the words “money
laundering offence” and replacing them by the words “money
laundering, terrorism financing or proliferation financing offence”;
(g) in section 19A, in subsection (3), by deleting the words “of terrorism” and
replacing them by the words “of terrorism or proliferation”;
(h) in section 19AA, in subsection (2)(a), by inserting, after subparagraph (iii), the
following new subparagraph –
(iiiA) the Director of Public Prosecutions;
(i) in section 19B, by adding the following new subsection, the existing provision
being numbered as subsection (1) –
(2) The National Committee shall, for the purpose of subsection
(1)(b), maintain comprehensive statistics on matters relevant to the
effectiveness and efficiency of the AML/CFT systems, which shall include
statistics on –
(a) suspicious transactions received and disseminated;
(b) money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation
investigations, prosecutions and convictions;
(c) property frozen, seized and confiscated;
(d) mutual legal assistance or other international requests
for cooperation made and received; and
(e) such other information as the National Committee may
deem necessary.
(j) in section 19D –
(i) by repealing subsection (1) and replacing it by the following subsection
–
(1) Unless otherwise provided in any other enactment, the
Ministry shall, under the direction of the National Committee, coordinate
measures to identify, assess, update, mitigate and understand the
money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing risks.
(ii) by inserting, after subsection (1), the following new subsection –
(1A) The Ministry may, where it considers that the risk
situation so requires, review the national risk assessment more
frequently or conduct ad hoc sectoral risk assessments.
(iii) by repealing subsections (2) and (3) and replacing th
r the direction of the National Committee, coordinate
measures to identify, assess, update, mitigate and understand the
money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation financing risks.
(ii) by inserting, after subsection (1), the following new subsection –
(1A) The Ministry may, where it considers that the risk
situation so requires, review the national risk assessment more
frequently or conduct ad hoc sectoral risk assessments.
(iii) by repealing subsections (2) and (3) and replacing them by the following
new subsections –
(2) For the purpose of subsection (1), the Ministry shall
coordinate and conduct an assessment of the risks of money
laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing risks.
(3) The Ministry shall, as far as practicable, make available
the findings of the national risk assessment, including updates and
reviews, to –
(a) every competent authority for the purpose of
subsection (4); and
(b) reporting persons, in order to assist them to
identify, understand, manage and mitigate the
risk of money laundering, terrorism financing and
proliferation financing.
(iv) by inserting, after subsection (3), the following new subsection –
(3A) The Ministry shall publish a summary of the findings of
the assessment which shall not contain any classified information or
any information permitting the identification of any natural person or
name any legal person.
(v) in subsection (4), by deleting the words “Every supervisory and
investigatory” and replacing them by the words “Every competent”;
(k) in section 19E –
(i) in subsection (1), by deleting the words “a supervisory authority, an
investigatory authority” and replacing them by the words “a competent
authority”;
(ii) in subsection (2)(a), by deleting the words “supervisory authority,
investigatory authority or” and replacing them by the words “competent
authority or”;
(l) by inserting, after section 19E, the following new section –
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Can the FIU freeze my bank transaction while it investigates?
- How long can the FIU suspend my transaction for?
- Can the FIU extend the suspension of my transaction?
- Can I be told why the FIU suspended my transaction?