Section 35A: Electronically recorded documents
consolidated text (as at 2016, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
35A. Electronically recorded documents
(1) Where an electronically recorded document bears, as evidence that
the document emanates from a particular individual, a personal identification
mark, the mark shall have the same legal effect as if the individual had
signed his name on the document, or affixed his thumbprint or other mark
thereto, in accordance with section 34.
(2) Except where it is otherwise provided in any other enactment, it shall
be lawful to electronically record any matter.
(3) Where any matter is electronically recorded, a reference in any enactment—
(a) to an original shall be construed as a reference to that record;
[Issue 6] I20 – 14
Revised Laws of Mauritius
(b) to a true or certified copy shall be construed as a reference to a
reprint of that record.
[S. 35A inserted by Act 18 of 1998.]
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Does an electronic mark or signature have the same legal effect as a handwritten signature?
- Is it legal to keep an electronic record of a document instead of a paper original?