Section 4: Functions of Human Rights Division
consolidated text (as at 2018, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
4. Functions of Human Rights Division
(1) Subject to subsection (2), the Human Rights Division may, without prejudice to the jurisdiction of the Courts or the powers conferred on the Director
of Public Prosecutions or the appropriate Service Commission—
(a) enquire into any written complaint from any person alleging that
any of his human rights has been, is being or is likely to be violated by the act or omission of any other person acting in the
performance of any public function conferred by any law or otherwise in the performance of the functions of any public office or
any public body;
(b) —
(c) where it has reason to believe that an act or omission such as is
referred to in paragraph (a) has occurred, is occurring or is likely
to occur, of its own motion enquire into the matter;
(d) —
(e) —
(f) —
(g) —
(2) (a) The Human Rights Division shall not enquire into any matter after
the expiry of 2 years from the date on which the act or omission which is
the subject of a complaint is alleged to have occurred.
(b) The Human Rights Division shall not discharge its functions nor
exercise powers in relation to any of the officers and authorities specified in
the proviso to section 97 (2) of the Constitution.
(c) In the exercise of its functions under subsection (1) (a) or (c), the
Human Rights Division may, where appropriate, refer the matter to the
National Preventive Mechanism Division to enquire into the case.
(3) The Human Rights Division shall, in the first place, attempt to resolve
any complaint, or any matter which is the subject of an enquiry pursuant to
subsection (1) (c), by a conciliatory procedure.
(4) Where the Human Rights Division is not able to resolve a matter
through conciliation, it shall, on the completion of its enquiry—
(a) where the enquiry discloses a violation of human rights or negligence in the prevention of such violation, refer the matter to—
(i) the Director of Public Prosecutions where it appears that an
offence may have been committed;
P46 – 5 [Issue 10]
Protection of Human Rights Act
(ii) the appropriate Service Commission where it appears that
disciplinary procedures may be warranted;
(iii) the chief executive officer of the appropriate public body
where it appears that disciplinary action is warranted
against an employee of a public body who is not within the
jurisdiction of a Service Commission;
(b) recommend the grant of such relief to the complainant or to
such other person as the Human Rights Division may determine;
(c) inform the complainant, if any, of any action taken under this
subsection.
(5) The Human Rights Division shall, on the completion of its enquiry,
send a written communication setting out its conclusion and any recommendation to the Minister who shall as soon as practicable report to the Commission the action taken or proposed to be taken.
(6) —
[S. 4 amended by s. 6 of Act 19 of 2012 w.e.f. 1 July 2013; s. 27 (1) (c) of Act 14 of 2016
w.e.f. 9 April 2018.]
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Can I complain to the Human Rights Division if a public official violated my rights?
- How long do I have to file a human rights complaint after the incident happened?
- Does the Human Rights Division try to settle my complaint before taking further action?
- If the Division finds my rights were violated, what can it do about it?