Section 312: Objection to removal from register
consolidated text (as at 2018, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
312. Objection to removal from register
(1) Where a notice is given of an intention to remove a company from
the register, any person may deliver to the Registrar, not later than the date
specified in the notice, an objection to the removal on grounds that—
(a) the company is still carrying on business or there is other reason
for it to continue in existence;
(b) the company is a party to legal proceedings;
(c) the company is in receivership, or liquidation, or both;
[Issue 6] C35 – 184
Revised Laws of Mauritius
(d) the person is a creditor, or a shareholder, or a person who has
an undischarged claim against the company;
(e) the person believes that there exists, and intends to pursue, a
right of action on behalf of the company under Part XII; or
(f) for any other reason, it would not be just and equitable to
remove the company from the register.
(1A) Where a person delivers an objection under subsection (1), he shall,
at the same time, serve a copy of same on the company.
(1B) Where a person delivers an objection under subsection (1), he shall
file proof of the ground of objection with the Registrar within 2 weeks of the
date of the objection and shall, at the same time, serve a copy thereof on
the company.
(1C) Where a person fails to comply with subsection (1B), the objection
delivered under subsection (1) shall be deemed to have lapsed.
(1D) (a) Where an objection delivered before 1 July 2009 has not been
withdrawn, the objection shall not be entertained and shall be deemed to
have lapsed unless proof of the grounds of objection is filed with the Registrar within a period of 6 weeks from the commencement of this subsection.
(b) Where the proof referred to in paragraph (a) is not submitted
within the period referred to in that paragraph, the Registrar shall remove the
company from the register.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) (d)—
(a) a claim by a creditor against a company is not an undischarged
claim where—
(i) the claim has been paid in full;
(ii) the claim has been paid in part under a compromise
entered into under Part XVII or by being otherwise
compounded to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor;
(iii) the claim has been paid in full or in part by a receiver or a
liquidator in the course of a completed receivership or liquidation; or
(iv) a receiver or a liquidator has notified the creditor that the
assets of the company are not sufficient to enable any
payment to be made to the creditor; and
(b) a claim by a shareholder or any other person against a company
is not an undischarged claim unless—
(i) payment has been made to the shareholder or that person
in accordance with a right under the company’s constitution or this Act to receive or share in the company’s
surplus assets; or
C35 – 185 [Issue 9]
Companies Act
(ii) a receiver or liquidator has notified the shareholder or that
person that the company has no surplus assets.
[S. 312 amended by s. 7 (i) of Act 14 of 2009 w.e.f. 30 July 2009; s. 9 (h) of Act 18 of 2016
w.e.f. 7 September 2016; s. 4 (f) of Act 4 of 2017 w.e.f. 20 May 2017.]
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- On what grounds can I object to my company being struck off the register?
- How soon after objecting to a strike-off must I file proof of my grounds?