Section 283: Where objection was taken to a name on the list of claimants, the

283. Where objection was taken to a name on the list of claimants, the claimant was in attendance and answered certain questions tending to show CON – 239 [Issue 1] The Constitution that he was in receipt of salary and entitled to be registered. On the objector stating that he was not satisfied with the evidence and wanted further proof of the claim, the case was postponed to a later hour in the day. The claimant did not appear then and his name was expunged. HELD confirming Mooktaram v Tiang-Qui-Lien (1931), the claimant was entitled to be registered as a voter. d’Unienville v Laurent (1931).