Section 16: When defendant does not appear
consolidated text (as at 2006, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
16. When defendant does not appear
(1) Where on the day so fixed in the summons, or at any continuation or
adjournment of the Court or cause in which the summons was issued, the
defendant does not appear, or does not sufficiently excuse his absence, the
Court, upon the proof of the service of the summons, may give judgment in
terms of the plaint or, where the cause includes a claim for substantial damages, proceed to the hearing of the witnesses and trial of the cause on the
part of the plaintiff only, and in either case, the judgment shall, subject to
subsection (2), be as valid as if both parties had attended.
(2) In any case in which judgment has been so given in the absence of
the defendant, the Court may, at the same or any subsequent sitting and on
proof that he did not receive service of the plaint with summons or on other
sufficient cause shown, set aside the judgment and order a new trial of the
cause of action upon such terms, including the payment of costs or the giving of security for debt or costs, as the Court may determine.
[S. 16 amended by Act 4 of 1999.]
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- If the defendant doesn't turn up in court, can judgment be given against them anyway?
- If judgment was given against me while I was absent, can I get it set aside if I show I never received the summons?