Section 273: Termination by Court
consolidated text (as at 2017, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
273. Termination by Court
(1) The Court may terminate a deed of company arrangement on the application of—
(a) the company;
(b) a creditor;
(c) the deed administrator; or
(d) any other interested person.
(2) The Court may terminate a deed of company arrangement where it is
satisfied that—
(a) an information breach has occurred;
(b) there has been a material contravention of the deed by a person
bound by it;
(c) effect cannot be given to the deed without injustice or undue
delay;
(d) the deed or a provision of it is, an act done under the deed was,
or an act proposed to be done under the deed would be—
(i) oppressive or unfairly prejudicial to, or unfairly discriminatory
against, one or more of the creditors; or
(ii) contrary to the interests of the company as a whole;
(e) the deed should be terminated for some other reason.
(3) The Court shall not terminate the deed without first taking into account the rights of third parties.
[Issue 3] I14 – 152
Revised Laws of Mauritius
(4) In this section—
“information breach” means—
(a) the giving of false or misleading information about the company’s
business, property, affairs, or financial circumstances—
(i) to the administrator or a creditor; or
(ii) in a report or statement under section 237 (4) that accompanies a notice of meeting at which a resolution that the
company execute a deed of company arrangement was
passed; or
(b) an omission from the report or statement referred to paragraph (a) (ii),
where the information or the omission, as the case may be, can reasonably
have been expected to be material to the creditors in deciding whether to
vote in favour of the resolution that the company execute the deed of company arrangement.