Section 23: Termination of appointment
consolidated text (as at 2012, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
23. Termination of appointment
(1) Where—
(a) the Parliamentary Committee has reason to believe that the
Director-General has been guilty of such gross negligence, irregularity or misconduct that his appointment ought to be terminated; or
(b) the Director-General is unable to discharge the functions of his
office, whether such inability arises from infirmity of body or
mind or any other cause,
the Parliamentary Committee may, by majority decision of its members, suspend the Director-General from office.
(2) Where the Parliamentary Committee suspends the Director-General
under subsection (1), it shall forthwith refer the matter to the AttorneyGeneral.
(3) Where a matter is referred to the Attorney-General under subsection (2), the Attorney-General shall advise the Parliamentary Committee
whether disciplinary proceedings or such other action as he thinks fit should
be taken against the Director-General under this section.
(4) Where the Attorney-General does not, within 7 days of the date on
which the Director-General was suspended, advise that proceedings be taken
against the Director-General, the suspension shall be lifted and the DirectorGeneral reinstated forthwith in his office.
(5) Where the Attorney-General advises that proceedings be taken
against the Director-General—
(a) the Attorney-General shall forward to the Parliamentary Committee the charge which the Director-General will be required to answer, and designate a law officer to sustain the charge;
(b) the Attorney-General shall, on such terms and conditions as he
may determine, appoint any person who holds or has held judicial office to hear and determine, without delay, whether the
charge has been established.
(6) The person appointed to hear and determine the charge under subsection (5) (b) shall, within 7 working days of the date on which the hearing is
completed, forward his findings and the record of all his proceedings and
evidence adduced before him to the Parliamentary Committee.
(7) Where the charge has been found established, the Parliamentary Committee shall, within 7 working days of the receipt of the findings and record
referred to in subsection (6), examine the findings and record and decide
whether the appointment of the Director-General ought to be terminated.
P24 – 15 [Issue 1]
Prevention of Corruption Act
(8) Where the Parliamentary Committee decides that the appointment of
the Director-General ought to be terminated, it shall communicate its decision to the Director-General forthwith.
[S. 23 amended by s. 9 of Act 24 of 2005 w.e.f. 1 October 2005.]
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Can the Director-General of ICAC be removed for misconduct, and who decides that?