Section 25B: Competitive negotiations
This section is inserted by Act No 15 of 2021, section 73.
consolidated text (as at 2018, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
25B. Competitive negotiations
(1) A public body may engage in competitive
negotiations where –
(a) there is an urgent need for the subject
matter of the procurement and engaging
in open advertised bidding or any other
competitive method of procurement would
be impractical and time-consuming,
provided that the circumstances giving
rise to the urgency were not foreseeable
by the public body or was not the result
of any dilatory conduct on the part of the
public body;
(b) due to a catastrophe, there is an urgent
need for the subject matter of the
procurement and open advertised bidding
or any other competitive method of
procurement would be impractical and
time-consuming;
(c) where all the bids received for an open
advertised bidding or restricted bidding
are classed as irregular or unacceptable;
(d) a public body determines that the use of
any other competitive method of
procurement is not appropriate for the
protection of the essential security
interests of Mauritius; or
(e) it is required as a complementary
procedure, because –
(i) there is a tie in the lowest evaluated
price by 2 or more bidders;
Acts 2021 429
(ii) there is a tie in the highest combined
score points; or
(iii) the lowest evaluated price
substantially exceeds the estimated
cost.
(2) (a) For the purpose of subsection (1)(e), the
(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:191)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:177)
(i) the bidders affected by the tie; or
(ii) the bidders that quoted prices
which are substantially above the
estimated cost.
(b) Where bidders quoted above the
(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:191)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:88)(cid:69)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:92) (cid:3)
shall –
(i) reveal the estimated cost to the
bidders; and
(ii) limit its invitation to bidders whose
evaluated prices are not more than
25 per cent above the estimated
cost.
(3) In subsection (1)(c) –
(a) “irregular”, in relation to a bid, means that –
(i) the bid does not comply with the
bidding documents;
(ii) there is evidence of collusion or
corruption; or
(iii) the bid is abnormally low;
(b) “unacceptable”, in relation to a bid, means
that –
(i) the bid was submitted by a bidder
who does not have the required
(cid:84)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:76)(cid:191)(cid:70)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:30)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)
430 Acts 2021
(ii) the price quoted substantially
exceeds the updated cost estimate.
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Can a public body use competitive negotiations instead of open bidding if there is an urgent, unforeseeable need?
- Can a public body use competitive negotiations if all bids received were irregular or unacceptable?