Section 59: Collusion, fraud and negligence
consolidated text (as at 2018, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
59. Collusion, fraud and negligence
(1) An inscribed or judgment creditor may also ask for subrogation in the
proceedings where there has been collusion, fraud or negligence on the part of—
(a) the creditor; or
(b) any financial institution, legal adviser and their agents,
carrying on the proceedings, without prejudice to the right of a party
aggrieved by the collusion, fraud, or negligence, as the case may be, to sue
any person responsible for damages to the inscribed or judgment creditor.
(2) In this section—
“negligence” means—
(a) the non-fulfilment of any prescribed formality;
(b) the fulfilment of any prescribed formality after the prescribed
time; or
(c) the non-exercise of due diligence in bringing the property under
seizure to adjudication.
[S. 59 amended by s. 48 (c) of Act 10 of 2017 w.e.f. 24 July 2017.]
60. —
S3 – 17 [Issue 10]
Sale of Immovable Property Act
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Can a creditor take over a forced property sale if there was fraud or collusion by whoever was running it?
- What counts as negligence by a creditor or their legal adviser running a forced property sale?