Section 66: Retrait successoral – Constitutionality—The repealed provisions of the
consolidated text (as at 2017). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
66. Retrait successoral – Constitutionality—The repealed provisions of the
Civil Code, which used to enable an heir to oust a stranger who had purchased undivided rights by refunding the purchase price with interest and
costs, did not offend sections 3 (c) and 8 of the Constitution. Burgus v Jeewon (1999).