Section 344: Preference and fraudulent transfer
consolidated text (as at 2017, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
344. Preference and fraudulent transfer
The liquidator of an insolvent party may not avoid or set aside—
(a) any transfer, substitution or exchange of cash, collateral or any
other interests under or in connection with a netting agreement
from the insolvent party to the non-insolvent party; or
(b) any payment or delivery obligation incurred by the insolvent party and owing to the non-insolvent party under or in connection
with a netting agreement,
on the ground of it constituting a preference, a transfer during a suspect
period or an onerous contract by the insolvent party to the non-insolvent party, unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the non-insolvent party
made the transfer or incurred the obligation with actual intent to hinder, delay,
or defraud any entity to which the insolvent party was indebted or
became indebted, on or after the date the transfer was made or the obligation
was incurred.
[Issue 4] I14 – 188
Revised Laws of Mauritius