Section 206: Outrage against public and religious morality
This section is inserted by Act No 3 of 2018, section 5.
consolidated text (as at 2016, amended since). juris shows the text as it was consolidated; it does not confirm that this is the law in force today.
206. Outrage against public and religious morality
(1) (a) Any person who –
(i) by any writing which is sold, put
up for sale, published, distributed,
posted up, circulated, exhibited,
exposed, broadcast or transmitted
through the internet or in any public
place, meeting or procession;
(ii) by words, gestures, exclamations
or threats used through the internet
or in any public place, meeting or
procession,
commits any outrage against any religion, or against good
morals or against public and religious morality (la morale
publique et religieuse), shall commit an offence and shall, on
conviction, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
2 years and to a fine not exceeding 100,000 rupees.
Acts 2018 77
(b) Matters of opinion on religious questions,
decently expressed or written, shall not be deemed to be an
outrage.
(2) Any writing or any copy of such writing in
respect of, or in connection with, which an offence has been
committed under this section shall be forfeited and destroyed,
or deleted, as the case may be.
(3) In this section –
“broadcast” means using radio communication,
whether by sound or vision, for reception by
members of the public;
“electronic” means relating to technology having
electrical, digital, magnetic, wireless, optical,
electromagnetic or similar capabilities;
“internet” means a publicly accessible system of
global interconnected computer networks which
uses the Internet Protocol as its communication
protocol to provide a variety of information and
communication facilities;
“writing” –
(a) means any newspaper, pamphlet, drawing,
engraving, picture, illustration, placard,
handbill, emblem, image, printed matter
or any other written work; and
(b) includes –
(i) any writing by electronic means; or
(ii) any communication, whether in the
form of speech or other sound.
(b) by repealing section 282 and replacing it by the following
section –
Ask juris about this section Official source
Questions this section answers
- Can I be prosecuted for posting something online that outrages religious morality?
- What is the penalty for an outrage against public and religious morality?
- Is expressing an opinion on a religious question, decently, treated as an outrage?